Loading...
Fifth National Report on the Implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (NR5)
  |  
BCH-NR5-AO-301556-1   |   PDF   |   Print   |  
| 
last updated: 19 Oct 2026
General Information

CHM-NFP-AO-283174-8 National Focal Points Ms. Joice Manuel Diogo
To view the current National Focal Point information, click here.

List of ministerial bodies and institutions to be invited  Ministry of the Environment (coordinating institution);  National Institute of Biodiversity and Conservation Areas;  Ministry of Agriculture and Forests;  Institute of Agronomic Research;  Institute of Veterinary Services;  Ministry of Health;  Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation;  Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources;  Ministry of Industry and Commerce;  General Tax Administration (Customs);  Ministry of the Interior (border control);  Ministry of Transport;  Ministry of Justice and Human Rights Research and educational institutions  Agostinho Neto University;  Methodist University of Angola;  National Institute of Health Research;  Research centers active in biotechnology, genetics, agriculture, and the environment.
EN

19 Oct 2026

01 Oct 2024
20 Dec 2026

No

The aforementioned report was prepared through a consultation and contribution workshop involving other ministerial bodies, NGOs, the private sector, local communities, and academia.
EN
Article 2 – General provisions
Article 2 requires each Party to take the necessary and appropriate legal, administrative and other measures to implement its obligations under the Protocol
National measures are partially in place
EN
  • One or more national biosafety regulations
  • One or more sets of biosafety guidelines
  • Other laws, regulations or guidelines that indirectly apply to biosafety
Angola possesses legal and regulatory instruments applicable to the implementation of national biosafety measures. A key instrument is Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29, which approves the Standards on Biosafety regarding the Management of Genetically Modified Seeds and establishes rules and oversight mechanisms applicable to—among other activities—the import, transit, research, confined trials, environmental release, cultivation, handling, and use of genetically modified seeds. This legal framework is complemented by other applicable national instruments, including seed legislation and its associated regulations. Presidential Decree No. 56/26 of April 7 also introduced amendments to the regulatory regime governing the import of transgenic or genetically modified seeds or grains. Despite progress made in developing the national legal framework, there remains a need to strengthen the operationalization and implementation of biosafety measures, as well as inter-institutional coordination and the technical and institutional capacities required to ensure the effective and comprehensive implementation of the provisions of the Cartagena Protocol and CITES (as reflected in Angola's Presidential Decree No. 311/18 of December 19) and the Basic Law on Forests and Wildlife (Law No. 6/7 of January 24).
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Biosafety is being incorporated into legislative instruments and a wide range of sectors, particularly agriculture, the environment, and biodiversity conservation. However, efforts are still underway to systematically consolidate biosafety aspects across all relevant sectoral and intersectoral policies and instruments.
EN
Yes
EN
No
EN
Yes
EN
10 or more
EN
No
EN
Existence of a Biosafety Laboratory linked to Health (in the accreditation phase in the country of the Institute for Research and Health (INIS) and a Food Quality Control Laboratory properly equipped in the accreditation phase that covers the area of analysis of Genetically Modified Organisms, Official Seed Control Laboratories and Genetic Markers, being the Laboratory of the Institute of Agricultural Research (IIA), the Institute of Veterinary Research (IIV) and the National Services of Seeds (SENSE))
EN
Article 5 – Pharmaceuticals
Yes, to some extent:
EN
ARMED: regulates medicines and health technologies, including aspects related to the authorization and control of pharmaceutical products. National Institute of Health: can contribute to research, surveillance, and laboratory evaluation, within its areas of competence.
EN
The effective implementation of Article 5 also requires strengthening coordination among ARMED, the National Institute of Health, the Ministry of Health, and the National Institute of Biodiversity and Conservation Areas (INBAC)—the latter acting as an involved institution in the national coordination of the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol. This cooperation should facilitate the identification of pharmaceutical products containing LMOs (living modified organisms), the clarification of respective regulatory competencies, and the sharing of technical information, in compliance with applicable international instruments.
EN
Article 6 – Transit and contained use
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola currently has specific legal provisions governing the transit of genetically modified seeds through its national territory. Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29 establishes requirements for transit authorization, the submission of documentation from the destination country, identification of the variety or genetic event, and the certification, packaging, and sealing of the cargo. However, it is important to determine whether these provisions fully encompass the scope of living modified organisms (LMOs) covered by the Cartagena Protocol, or if their application remains limited to genetically modified seeds.
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
There are national provisions regulating the research and development of genetically modified seeds under contained conditions. The legislation establishes requirements for authorization, facility accreditation, and the submission of monitoring and risk management measures, as well as safety and control requirements. However, the extent to which these provisions are operationalized and effectively applied to the different categories of LMOs covered by the Protocol needs to be assessed.
EN
No
EN
Angola has made progress in strengthening the national framework applicable to the transit and use of genetically modified organisms, namely through the approval of Presidential Decree No. 81/26, of April 29, 2026, which establishes biosafety standards relating to the management of genetically modified seeds. The aforementioned framework establishes procedures applicable to the transit operations of genetically modified seeds through the national territory, including authorization requirements, presentation of documentation and issuance of a transit certificate by the competent authority. The diploma also provides for requirements for the research, development and use of genetically modified seeds under containment conditions, including prior authorization from the competent authority and compliance with safety requirements applicable to laboratories and other facilities. Despite this progress, Angola continues to need reinforcement in the operationalization of the national biosafety framework, technical and institutional capacity, monitoring mechanisms and interinstitutional coordination, in order to ensure a comprehensive implementation of the provisions of Article 6 of the Cartagena Protocol.
EN
Articles 7 to 10: Advance informed agreement (AIA) and intentional introduction of LMOs into the environment
Yes, to some extent:
EN
The legislation regulates import, export, transit, and other activities related to genetically modified seeds. The legal instrument also identifies the exporter among the operators covered by the regime and establishes information and control requirements.
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
The Presidential Decree establishes detailed information requirements for applications concerning genetically modified seeds, including information on the variety, origin, genetic event, risk assessment, and management and control measures.
EN
No
EN
No
EN
EN
No
EN
Angola has been strengthening its legal and institutional framework governing the introduction, use, and management of genetically modified organisms. During the reporting period, Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29, 2026, was approved, establishing biosafety standards for the management of genetically modified seeds, including requirements for importation, research, confined trials, risk assessment and management, and release into the environment. The release of genetically modified seeds into the environment is subject to authorization by the National Seed Authority and the submission of relevant information and studies, including risk assessments and management plans regarding human health and the environment, monitoring measures, and—where applicable—socio-economic impact assessments. Decisions on applications are made by the competent authority following a review of the submitted requirements and information; additionally, the construction of a laboratory for GMO control within the national territory has been approved.
EN
Article 11 – Procedure for living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (LMOs-FFP)
Yes, to some extent:
EN
In Angola, a Genetically Modified Seeds Committee (CSGM) exists—established by Presidential Order No. 158/24 of July 16—to monitor and oversee this matter; additionally, Presidential Decree No. 151/26 of August 20 approves regulations regarding the protection of new seed varieties and the rights of seed improvers and breeders. Presidential Decree No. 81/26 establishes a management regime for genetically modified seeds, covering activities such as importation, cultivation, commercialization, use, and other operations related to them. Furthermore, Presidential Decree No. 117/20 of April 22 regulates the environmental licensing of projects, while Presidential Order No. 8/22 of January 13, 2022, aims to coordinate and control a multidisciplinary platform for the flow of statistical data and information regarding climate, land, and environmental, economic, and social indicators.
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
National legislation requires the submission of information and documentation for certain activities and products related to genetically modified organisms, including technical information, identification, origin, characteristics, and risk assessment.
EN
1 to 4
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
The current legal framework establishes procedures for the importation and control of genetically modified organisms, particularly genetically modified seeds. Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29 provides for authorization for certain operations and sets out requirements for the importation of genetically modified seeds. Therefore, a regulatory basis exists—including Decree 117/20 of April 22 and other laws currently under review—to address these matters.
EN
1 to 4
EN
Angola has been strengthening its legal and institutional framework regarding the management of genetically modified organisms, including measures applicable to the importation, use, cultivation, marketing, and other forms of utilization of genetically modified seeds. Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29 establishes biosafety standards for the management of genetically modified seeds and sets out requirements regarding authorization, technical information, risk assessment and management, oversight, and quality control. Presidential Decree No. 179/18 of August 2 approves the Regulation on Laboratory Analysis of Products Intended for Human and Animal Consumption (whether domestic, imported, or for export). However, the specific implementation of Article 11 provisions—regarding living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing—still requires strengthening, particularly through the clarification of applicable procedures, the responsibilities of competent authorities, enforcement measures against violations, and mechanisms for decision-making and information sharing.
EN
Article 12 – Review of decisions
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola has administrative and regulatory mechanisms in place that allow for the review of acts and decisions by competent authorities regarding the authorization and control of genetically modified organisms—spanning the entire process from review and drafting by the relevant bodies within the supervising ministry to submission to the Council of Ministers for approval and subsequent forwarding to the National Assembly for a vote.
EN
Yes
EN
5 to 9
EN
No
EN
No
EN
Angola has administrative and regulatory mechanisms in place for decision-making regarding the management and control of genetically modified organisms, including authorization and oversight procedures established within the national biosafety framework. The country recognizes the importance of having transparent mechanisms for the review and modification of decisions concerning the intentional transboundary movement of LMOs, in accordance with Article 12 of the Cartagena Protocol.
EN
Article 13 – Simplified procedure
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Presidential Decree No. 81/26 establishes various procedures regarding genetically modified seeds, such as: importation, exportation, transit, research, confined trials, risk assessment, authorization, and inspection and control. Angola has a national framework establishing administrative and regulatory procedures applicable to certain activities involving genetically modified organisms—including genetically modified seeds—covering, among other aspects, importation, transit, research, confined trials, risk assessment, authorization, and inspection.
EN
No
EN
Angola has simplified administrative and regulatory procedures applicable to the management of transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms, particularly regarding genetically modified seeds. The national framework establishes requirements concerning authorization, documentation, risk assessment and management, and oversight. However, the simplified procedure provided for in Article 13 of the Cartagena Protocol still needs to be formally consolidated and operationalized within the national framework; this includes clearly defining the categories of LMOs and the situations to which the procedure may apply, as well as the mechanisms for notification and communication to the Biosafety Clearing-House. During the reporting period, no instances were identified in which Angola formally applied the simplified procedure provided for in Article 13.
EN
Article 14 – Bilateral, regional and multilateral agreements and arrangements
None
EN
EN
Angola participates in various international cooperation instruments and mechanisms related to biodiversity conservation, the environment, agriculture, and sustainable development. However, during the reporting period, no specific bilateral, regional, or multilateral agreements or arrangements were identified—established by Angola with other Parties or non-Parties—exclusively or specifically aimed at regulating the transboundary movement of living modified organisms (LMOs) under Article 14 of the Cartagena Protocol. Angola recognizes the importance of bilateral, regional, and multilateral cooperation in strengthening the implementation of biosafety and prioritizes the enhancement of technical, scientific, and institutional cooperation—including information sharing, capacity building, risk assessment and management, and the prevention of and response to potential unintentional or illegal transboundary movements of LMOs.
EN
Articles 15 & 16 – Risk assessment and risk management
Yes
EN
  • For imports of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment
  • For imports of LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing
  • For decisions regarding domestic use, including placing on the market, of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movements for direct use as food or feed, or for processing
  • For imports of LMOs for contained use
  • Other (Genetically modified seeds intended for research, confined trials, cultivation, production, processing and other regulated uses.)
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola has regulatory mechanisms in place that provide for the assessment and management of risks associated with specific uses and movements of genetically modified organisms prior to decision-making by competent authorities. The national framework establishes requirements regarding technical information, the assessment of environmental impacts on biodiversity, the environment, and human health, and the Genetically Modified Seeds Assessment Committee.
EN
Conducting risk assessment or risk management
No
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola has established wildlife sanctuaries featuring quarantine and observation areas for species recovered from the community or confiscated, as well as experimental stations belonging to the Ministry of Agriculture.
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola has national mechanisms in place that include trials, risk assessment, monitoring, and control of specific activities involving genetically modified organisms, particularly within the scope of research and confined trials. These mechanisms enable the assessment of the organisms' behavior and the identification of potential risks prior to their wider use or application.
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Angola still requires additional technical guidance on risk assessment and management methodologies for different categories of GMOs, including organisms intended for environmental release, contained use, and GMOs intended for direct use as food or feed or for processing.
EN
Capacity-building in risk assessment or risk management
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
10 to 49
EN
No
EN
1 to 9
EN
No
EN
1 to 9
EN
No
EN
No
EN
Angola has made progress in establishing the legal and institutional framework for the assessment and management of risks associated with genetically modified organisms. The national framework sets out requirements for risk assessment, technical information, authorization, and management and control measures for specific activities involving genetically modified seeds, including research, confined trials, importation, and use or release into the environment. Despite this progress, there remains a need to strengthen national capacity for risk assessment and management, particularly regarding the availability of specialists, laboratory capacity for the detection and identification of LMOs, the development of standardized methodologies, post-release monitoring, human health risk assessment, and the management of risks associated with different categories of LMOs. Angola also prioritizes strengthening human resource training and improving access to international technical guidance on risk assessment and management, including materials developed under the Cartagena Protocol.
EN
Article 17 – Unintentional transboundary movements5 and emergency measures
5 In accordance with the operational definition adopted in decision CP-VIII/16, “‘Unintentional transboundary movement’ is a transboundary movement of a living modified organism that has inadvertently crossed the national borders of a Party where the living modified organism was released, and the requirements of Article 17 of the Protocol apply to such transboundary movements only if the living modified organism involved is likely to have significant adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, in the affected or potentially affected States.”
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola is part of the International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN) and has a Focal Point linked to the Ministry of Agriculture—specifically within the National Food Quality Service—through which notifications can be both received and issued.
EN
None
EN
None
EN
Yes
EN
Angola has institutional and regulatory mechanisms in place for the prevention, control, oversight, and management of risks associated with genetically modified organisms. These mechanisms involve various authorities with competencies in the areas of the environment, agriculture, health, trade, border control, and sanitary and phytosanitary control.
EN
Article 18 – Handling, transport, packaging and identification
Yes, to some extent:
EN
The national biosafety framework establishes control requirements for activities involving genetically modified organisms, including importation, transit, storage, use, and transportation.
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola has adopted national measures to regulate biosecurity, in particular through Presidential Decree No. 56/26 of April 7 and Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29. The latter establishes, in Article 33, requirements relating to the documentation accompanying genetically modified seeds, including a declaration of the presence of genetically modified seeds and the indication of contacts for obtaining additional information.
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
The national legal framework provides requirements for documentation, identification and use for certain categories of genetically modified organisms. However, the specific requirements relating to the express indication that the shipment contains GMOs, its non-intentionality for intentional release into the environment and the indication of the contact point for additional information should be strengthened and harmonised with the provisions of Article 18.2(b) of the Cartagena Protocol.
EN
As part of other documentation (not specific to LMOs)
EN
Yes
EN
As part of other documentation (not specific to LMOs)
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola has authorization and documentation requirements applicable to genetically modified organisms intended for intentional introduction into the environment. These requirements include information on the identity and characteristics of the agency, security and control measures, and information relating to those involved in the operation. However, the documentation requirements must continue to be harmonized and fully operationalized with the provisions of Article 18.2(d) of the Cartagena Protocol.
EN
Documentation specific to LMOs
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola has institutions with legal and operational competencies related to inspection, border control, agriculture, environment, seeds, and health. However, the specific capacity for the inspection of living modified organisms (LMOs) can still be considered partially developed, particularly regarding the identification and detection of LMOs, the availability of equipment and laboratory methods, specialized training of inspection agents, harmonized inspection procedures, and the capacity to respond to any unauthorized movements. Thus, it is considered that there is inspection capacity, although it is still necessary to strengthen the technical and specialized component.
EN
100 or more
EN
Yes
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
There is capacity and laboratory procedures related to the analysis of plant/GMO material, but the existence of a fully standardized and applied national procedure for sampling and detecting LMOs needs to be confirmed.
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
100 or more
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
1 to 4
EN
1 to 4
EN
Angola has an institutional and regulatory framework that establishes requirements related to the handling, transport, storage, use and control of genetically modified organisms, including genetically modified seeds. The country also has institutions with inspection, border control, laboratory analysis and risk management skills. Despite this progress, the full implementation of the requirements of Article 18 of the Cartagena Protocol, particularly with regard to specific documentation for different categories of LMOs, shipment identification, sampling, detection and laboratory identification, still needs to be strengthened. Key needs include strengthening the capacity of customs and enforcement authorities, specialized training of officials responsible for border control, establishing and harmonizing sampling and detection procedures, availability of certified reference materials, and strengthening national laboratory infrastructure. Angola considers it a priority to ensure greater coordination between authorities responsible for the environment, agriculture, seeds, health, trade, customs and border control, in order to guarantee the effective implementation of the identification, documentation and security requirements set out in the Protocol.
EN
Article 19 – Competent national authorities and national focal points
Not applicable, only one competent national authority was designated
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola has institutions, legislation, and personnel with skills related to biosafety, but limitations still exist in: specialized human resources; laboratories; and funding.
EN
Yes
EN
During the reporting period, Angola undertook initiatives aimed at strengthening collaboration between the National Focal Point of the Cartagena Protocol, the National Focal Point of the Biosafety Clearing-House, national competent authorities, and institutions from different sectors. These initiatives included inter-institutional technical meetings, information sharing, and consultations with relevant sectors as part of the preparation process for the Fifth National Report on the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol. These activities contributed to improving coordination, identifying implementation gaps, gathering sectoral information, and promoting an integrated approach to biosafety.
EN
Angola has an institutional system involving different sectors with responsibilities related to biosafety, including the environment, agriculture, seeds, health, trade, scientific research, and border control and enforcement. The National Focal Point of the Cartagena Protocol plays a central role in coordination and communication related to the implementation of the Protocol, including liaison with the Biosafety Clearing-House. During the reporting period, inter-institutional coordination initiatives were developed, including technical meetings and consultations with relevant sectors for the preparation of the Fifth National Report on the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol. These activities allowed for the collection of sectoral information, the promotion of knowledge sharing, and the identification of needs for strengthening national capacity. Despite progress, Angola still needs to strengthen institutional capacity, specialized human resources, formal inter-institutional coordination mechanisms, laboratory capacity, financial resources, and biosafety management and information sharing systems. Strengthening these elements is considered essential to ensure the effective and sustainable implementation of the Cartagena Protocol.
EN
Article 20 – Information-sharing and the Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH):
Information available but only partially available in the BCH
EN
Information available but not in the BCH
EN
Information available but not in the BCH
EN
Information available and in the BCH
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information available but not in the BCH
EN
Information available but not in the BCH
EN
Information not available
EN
Information available but not in the BCH
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information available but not in the BCH
EN
Some information relevant to the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol is available at the national level, but has not yet been fully submitted or updated in the Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH). This situation is related, among other aspects, to the need to consolidate information from different competent national institutions, update national registries, and strengthen coordination between the National Focal Point of the Protocol, the National Focal Point of the BCH, and the competent national authorities. The country recognizes the need to improve the regularity, completeness, and updating of the information available in the BCH.
EN
Yes
EN
Yes, in some cases
EN
No
EN
No
EN
Angola has been strengthening the implementation of Article 20 of the Cartagena Protocol, notably through the maintenance of national focal points and participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House. The country possesses relevant normative and institutional information on biosafety, including recently approved legislation on the management of genetically modified seeds. However, challenges remain related to the consolidation, updating, and systematic availability of national information in the BCH. Strengthening inter-institutional coordination, technical capacity, and information management is a priority to improve Angola's participation in the BCH. The CBD currently identifies the national contacts for the Cartagena Protocol, including the National Focal Point, the emergency contact, and the BCH Focal Point.
EN
Article 21 – Confidential information
Yes
EN
No
EN
Angola has general mechanisms in place for the protection of confidential information within its administrative and institutional procedures. However, it is necessary to continue strengthening and formalizing specific procedures applicable to confidential information received under the Cartagena Protocol, including criteria for the identification, processing, access, storage, and disclosure of such information, in accordance with the provisions of Article 21.
EN
Article 22 – Capacity-building
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Biosafety training activities have been carried out primarily using funding made available within specific projects and programs. However, there is still no permanent and predictable national financial allocation exclusively dedicated to the continuous implementation of biosafety training and capacity building activities.
EN
Yes
EN
  • Bilateral channels
  • Regional channels
  • Multilateral channels
No
EN
Not applicable
EN
Yes
EN
  • Institutional capacity and human resources
  • Integration of biosafety in cross-sectoral and sectoral legislation, policies and institutions (mainstreaming biosafety)
  • Risk assessment and other scientific and technical expertise
  • Risk management
  • Public awareness, participation and education in biosafety
  • Information exchange and data management, including participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House
  • Scientific, technical and institutional collaboration at subregional, regional and international levels
  • Identification of LMOs, including their detection
  • Socioeconomic considerations
  • Implementation of the documentation requirements under Article 18.2 of the Protocol
  • Measures to address unintentional and/or illegal transboundary movements of LMOs
  • Scientific biosafety research relating to LMOs
Yes
EN
No
EN
Yes
EN
  • Institutional capacity and human resources
  • Integration of biosafety in cross-sectoral and sectoral legislation, policies and institutions (mainstreaming biosafety)
  • Risk assessment and other scientific and technical expertise
  • Risk management
  • Public awareness, participation and education in biosafety
  • Information exchange and data management, including participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House
  • Scientific, technical and institutional collaboration at subregional, regional and international levels
  • Technology transfer
  • Sampling, detection and identification of LMOs
  • Socioeconomic considerations
  • Implementation of the documentation requirements for handling, transport, packaging and identification
  • Handling of confidential information
  • Measures to address unintentional and/or illegal transboundary movements of LMOs
  • Scientific biosafety research relating to LMOs
  • Taking into account risks to human health
  • Liability and redress
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Angola has made progress in developing and strengthening capacities to implement the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety through participation in training activities, technical workshops, regional and international exchanges, and initiatives supported by development partners. The country has designated national focal points and institutions with biosafety-related responsibilities and has participated in capacity-building activities concerning the Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH). However, needs for institutional and technical strengthening persist, particularly in the areas of risk assessment and management, detection and identification of LMOs, information management and sharing, use and updating of the BCH, documentation, public awareness, scientific research, inter-institutional coordination, and effective enforcement of the national regulatory framework. Regarding funding, Angola has benefited from support through multilateral mechanisms and GEF-backed initiatives to strengthen biosafety capacities. Nevertheless, the availability of predictable and sustainable national funding remains a challenge for ensuring the continuity of capacity-building activities and the full implementation of obligations under the Protocol. The GEF recognizes biosafety capacity-building—including the strengthening of national frameworks, risk assessment and management, and participation in the BCH—as key areas for supporting countries. Angola prioritizes strengthening inter-institutional coordination, developing a functional national biosafety capacity-building mechanism, systematically updating and making information available on the BCH, and mobilizing sustainable financial resources for capacity development.
EN
Article 23 – Public awareness and participation
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Angola has established legal mechanisms to guarantee public access to information about genetically modified seeds. Pursuant to Presidential Decree No. 81/26, the public must be informed in an adequate, timely and effective manner about decision-making processes related to activities involving genetically modified seeds. The legal framework also provides for public participation through the presentation of comments, information and opinions during public consultation processes, as well as the dissemination of decisions adopted, without prejudice to the protection of confidential information.
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Decree No. 81/26 expressly provides for public participation in the decision-making process, including the setting of timeframes for participation, the submission of comments, and the consideration of the results of public participation by the competent authority.
EN
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Angola has a legal framework that provides for mechanisms and modalities for the information and participation of stakeholders and the public regarding matters related to biosafety and living modified organisms. However, given the recent approval and entry into force of part of the applicable regulatory framework, the practical operationalization of these mechanisms—including the definition of procedures, dissemination channels, timelines, and methods for gathering and considering public input—is still being consolidated. Thus, while provisions establishing participation modalities exist, it is necessary to continue strengthening their ongoing dissemination and effective implementation.
EN
1 to 4
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
There is no approved strategy in place. Angola has Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29 regarding the management of genetically modified seeds; the article concerning communication channels stipulates that the competent authority must use appropriate means to ensure public access to information and effective public participation. However, this legal instrument does not, in itself, constitute a National Biosafety Communication Strategy. Angola also has the Executive’s National Institutional Communication Plan (2024–2027), but this is a general instrument for the Executive's institutional communication rather than a specific strategy for biosafety communication.
EN
Yes
EN
Angola has carried out awareness-raising and capacity-building activities regarding biosafety, but there may not yet be a permanent national program that is structured and funded exclusively for this purpose.
EN
Yes
EN
Angola has general institutional webpages and platforms through which information related to the environment, agriculture, seeds, and biosafety can be disseminated, as well as international information-sharing mechanisms, notably the Biosafety Clearing-House. However, to date, no standalone national website has been identified that is officially designated and specifically dedicated to biosafety and the systematic provision of information regarding living modified organisms, decisions, risk assessments, legislation, authorizations, and public participation mechanisms. Thus, it is considered that a fully established, specific national biosafety website does not yet exist; instead, there are individual information-sharing web resources, such as general institutional portals—where information on the environment, agriculture, seeds, or biosafety may occasionally be published—and the international Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH), which contains national information provided by the Parties, including national contacts, legislation, decisions, and—where available—national biosafety websites or databases.
EN
Yes
EN
Angola has made progress in strengthening public awareness and participation regarding biosafety. Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29, which approves biosafety regulations concerning the management of genetically modified seeds, establishes specific provisions for awareness-raising, public participation, and access to information in decision-making processes related to genetically modified seeds. The legal framework stipulates that the public be informed in an adequate, timely, and effective manner, enabling participation through the submission of comments, information, and opinions during public consultation processes. It also provides for the results of decisions to be made accessible to the public, without prejudice to the protection of information deemed confidential. Despite these advances, needs remain regarding the operationalization of public participation mechanisms, the systematic dissemination of participation modalities, the strengthening of awareness-raising and educational activities, and the development of a structured national biosafety communication strategy. Angola will continue to promote access to information and the participation of various stakeholder groups in processes related to the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol.
EN
Article 24 – Non-Parties
No
EN
No
EN
No
EN
During the reporting period, no specific agreements entered into by Angola with non-Parties regarding the transboundary movement of living modified organisms were identified. Likewise, no information was reported confirming transboundary movements of LMOs between Angola and non-Parties within the framework of national procedures for implementing the Protocol. Angola will continue to ensure that any potential transboundary movement involving LMOs is handled in accordance with the objectives and safety requirements established by the Cartagena Protocol and applicable national legislation.
EN
Article 25 – Illegal transboundary movements 7
7 In accordance with the operational definition adopted in decision CP-VIII/16, “‘Illegal transboundary movement’ is a transboundary movement of living modified organisms carried out in contravention of the domestic measures to implement the Protocol that have been adopted by the Party concerned”
Yes, to some extent:
EN
Yes. Angola has legal measures in place to prevent, control, and penalize unauthorized movements and activities involving genetically modified seeds. Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29 establishes mechanisms for prior authorization, control, oversight, and inspection applicable to the import, transit, research, environmental release, cultivation, and other activities involving genetically modified seeds. The decree also sets forth a sanctions regime applicable to—among other situations—unauthorized import and transit, introduction via an unauthorized entry point, failure to provide proper identification or labeling, and use of the material for purposes other than those authorized. These measures may include fines, increased penalties for repeat offenses, ancillary sanctions, and, in certain circumstances, the seizure or destruction of the material, without prejudice to potential criminal liability.
EN
None
EN
Angola has legal and administrative measures in place to prevent and sanction activities carried out in violation of national regulations applicable to genetically modified organisms and seeds. Presidential Decree No. 81/26 establishes biosafety standards, oversight mechanisms, and a sanctions regime applicable to specific infractions related to the import, transit, research, release into the environment, cultivation, handling, and use of genetically modified seeds. During the reporting period, no officially reported cases of illegal transboundary movements of LMOs were identified. However, it remains necessary to strengthen border monitoring and control capacities, including the training of competent officials, sampling and detection mechanisms, and coordination among institutions responsible for biosafety, agriculture, the environment, trade, and customs control.
EN
Article 26 – Socio-economic considerations
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
In some cases only
EN
Angola has a legal framework that allows for the consideration of relevant factors in decision-making regarding genetically modified organisms. Presidential Decree No. 81/26 strengthens the national biosafety framework applicable to genetically modified seeds and establishes procedures for assessment and decision-making. Despite these advances, the systematic consideration of socioeconomic aspects associated with LMOs remains an area requiring further development. In particular, Angola identifies a future need to develop guidelines, methodologies, and technical criteria for assessing socioeconomic impacts, complementing environmental risk assessments and the consideration of potential risks to human health.
EN
Article 28 – Financial mechanism and resources
5,000 to 49,999 USD
EN
Article 33 – Monitoring and reporting
Article 33 requires Parties to monitor the implementation of its obligations under the Cartagena Protocol and to report to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on measures taken to implement the Protocol.
Yes
EN
Cooperation
Goal B.4 of the Implementation Plan for the Cartagena Protocol addresses cooperation and coordination on biosafety issues at the national, regional and international levels. Questions related to this goal are presented below, including questions related to cooperation under different provisions of the Protocol.
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
No
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Angola has participated in national, regional, and international cooperation initiatives related to the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. This cooperation has included the exchange of scientific, technical, and institutional knowledge; participation in workshops and capacity-building activities; the use of materials and technical guidelines provided under the Protocol; and collaboration with international institutions and partners. At the national level, collaboration has been strengthened among the Cartagena Protocol National Focal Point, competent authorities, and institutions across various sectors. During the preparation of the Fifth National Report, technical sessions and inter-institutional consultations were held to gather information, identify gaps, and assess the status of the Protocol's implementation. Angola considers scientific, technical, and institutional cooperation to be an essential component for strengthening national biosafety capacity, particularly in areas such as risk assessment and management, detection and identification of LMOs, monitoring, information management, public participation, human resource capacity building, and the strengthening of institutional mechanisms. Despite the progress achieved, there remains a need to enhance cooperation and mobilize resources, especially for developing laboratory capacity, specialized training, socio-economic assessment, risk management, and the operationalization of national information-sharing mechanisms.
EN
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
Parties to the Cartagena Protocol that are not yet Party to the Supplementary Protocol are also invited to respond to the questions below
No
EN
No
EN
Only draft measures exist
EN
  • No instruments are in place
Angola currently possesses various regulatory and administrative instruments for the management and control of genetically modified organisms, particularly genetically modified seeds. Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29, 2026, establishes procedures for authorization and licensing, risk assessment and management, quarantine, monitoring and inspection, identification, labeling and traceability, and transport and transit, as well as control measures and a sanctions regime. The decree also sets out specific requirements for research, use under contained conditions, confined trials, release into the environment, and cultivation. The instruments provided for include risk assessment forms and documentation, monitoring and risk management plans, authorizations, transit certificates, activity logs and reports, identification and labeling documentation, and mechanisms for inspection and incident response.
EN
No
EN
Yes
EN
No
EN
No
EN
No
EN
  • Yes, in other instruments: (Angola has specific provisions regarding liability for damages arising from activities involving genetically modified seeds. Presidential Decree No. 81/26 of April 29 establishes that the applicant is liable for damages resulting from activities involving genetically modified seeds and their products, including the costs of assessing and repairing such damage. The same decree sets out obligations regarding notification and the adoption of emergency and mitigation measures in the event of accidents involving genetically modified seeds. However, specific rules concerning liability and the reparation of damages have yet to be drafted by the Seed Committee and submitted to the National Seed Authority for approval. Thus, while a specific legal basis for liability exists, its operational framework requires supplementary regulation.)
No
EN
During the reporting period, Angola undertook activities to strengthen its national biosafety framework that are relevant to the liability and redress principles set out in the Nagoya–Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol. Key activities included the review and consolidation of the national biosafety legal framework, the strengthening of mechanisms to prevent and respond to incidents involving genetically modified seeds, and the establishment of provisions regarding liability for damage and the costs of assessment and redress. Efforts were also made to foster institutional coordination and consultation among relevant sectors. These initiatives contribute to building the national capacity required to implement the principles of liability and redress, although further development of specific regulatory and institutional mechanisms remains necessary.
EN
Other information
Despite the progress achieved, challenges persist in the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol in Angola, particularly regarding the strengthening of inter-institutional coordination, technical capacity, supervision, and laboratory infrastructure for the identification of GMOs. There is also a need to harmonize procedures, update information at the Biosafety Information Center (BIC), promote awareness and public participation, and operationalize accountability and redress mechanisms – including those related to the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol. Overcoming these challenges requires strengthening financial, human, and institutional resources, as well as intersectoral cooperation and continuous capacity building.
EN
Comments on reporting format
During the preparation of this National Report, Angola faced several challenges, mainly related to the availability, updating, systematization, and consolidation of information from various institutions and sectors involved in the implementation of biosafety. In some cases, inter-institutional consultations and coordination were necessary to validate information on the legal and institutional framework, capacity building, risk assessment and management, supervision, detection and identification of GMOs (living modified organisms), information exchange, and public participation.  

Difficulties also arose in the interpretation of certain questions—specifically in distinguishing between the existence of legal provisions and their effective implementation during the reporting period, as well as between general national mechanisms and those specifically established for the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol.  

For future National Reporting processes, Angola recommends strengthening technical guidance on the interpretation of questions, providing practical examples for the various response options, maintaining an updated national biosafety database, and reinforcing coordination and information-sharing mechanisms between the National Focal Point, the competent authorities, and the relevant sectors.  

It is also recommended that, whenever possible, specific guidance be provided on the types of documents and evidence to be considered for each issue, in order to ensure greater consistency, comparability and quality of the information reported by the Parties.
EN